Dear Friends and companions,
Sometimes truth hurts and the well-intended is not always good on a continuous basis. This happens within all emergency aid as I was told by experts from UNICEF, WORLDVISION and other organisations. After the Tsunami Little Smile and myself were also concerned and this shocked me.
Are we allowed to tell people what went wrong without risking that they stop their help? Isn’t it like suicide for an organisation, which is only able to help as long as there are people who provide money for this help? On the other side: Aren’t openness and honesty the essential basis for trust and trust again the basis for all other things? Maybe you are able to understand after the upcoming lines how difficult and sometimes painful the balancing act between my old and my new home country was and still is.
Dear friends,
I don’t want to criticize the work of others. Very soon after the Tsunami catastrophe I told all employees of Little Smile to only look at our work, because that is what we are responsible for. But we were not untouched by the developments. When aid organizations came to Sri Lanka after the Tsunami catastrophe, they brought large sums of money and did not really have a clue about the country. It happened that they paid double the price for a driver than Little Smile is paying for the manager of all projects - that is our manager Anton. There is definitely something wrong with the proportionality. When our workers and employees run away from our organization because they are getting much more salary from the new organizations – sometimes nearly 10 times as much – then this creates a multi class society, jealousy and distrust. But much more grave is: suddenly people with money are attracted by social work and many of these new social workers and project managers are in charge of large amounts of money in short period time. It was impossible for us to recruit engineers, architects or honest contractors at fair prices. Finally, I was forced to organize nearly all construction projects by myself, because it was the only way to guarantee that the donations are used in a correct way. Each plan, each purchase, each simple construction phase, even each step had to be stringently controlled.
|
Between hope and fear:
|